<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for When More PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts on PR from Baker Communications Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Darwin Would Have Loved Technology by Why Darwin Would Have Loved Technology &#171; When More PR? &#124; European &#38; French IT world see on PR side &#124; Scoop.it</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=494#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Darwin Would Have Loved Technology &#171; When More PR? &#124; European &#38; French IT world see on PR side &#124; Scoop.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=494#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...]  Why Darwin Would Have Loved Technology &#171; When More PR?              Source: bakercg.com [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Why Darwin Would Have Loved Technology &laquo; When More PR?              Source: bakercg.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delicate Dance of Disclosure by Tweets that mention The Delicate Dance of Disclosure « When More PR? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=446#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Delicate Dance of Disclosure « When More PR? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=446#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joseph Eckert. Joseph Eckert said: RT @bakertweets: Steve Jobs and the Delicate Dance of Disclosure - WhenMorePR blog - http://bit.ly/esMw5p [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joseph Eckert. Joseph Eckert said: RT @bakertweets: Steve Jobs and the Delicate Dance of Disclosure &#8211; WhenMorePR blog &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/esMw5p" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/esMw5p</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of Tech PR in 2011 by Tweets that mention The State of Tech PR in 2011 « When More PR? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=437#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The State of Tech PR in 2011 « When More PR? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=437#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joseph Eckert. Joseph Eckert said: RT @GlennRman: The State of Tech PR in 2011 http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=437 anyone publishing + drawing an audience now a media outlet #in [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joseph Eckert. Joseph Eckert said: RT @GlennRman: The State of Tech PR in 2011 <a href="http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=437" rel="nofollow">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=437</a> anyone publishing + drawing an audience now a media outlet #in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking Your Business to Your Customers by Twitted by GlennRman</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=343#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by GlennRman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=343#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by GlennRman [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by GlennRman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care in the U.S. is Neither Healthy Nor Caring by Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=320#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=320#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I bleed for you about that. In Washington State, things are a bit different, though for how long I don&#039;t know. Perhaps our cost of medical care is lower, but we pay $1,300 per month for a family of four (my wife and I and our two sons, who are 2 and 5) with a $0 deductible, 20% co-pay to $10K out of pocket each ($30K total per year as a family), some optical ($200 every two years), chiropractic, etc. It&#039;s an awesome plan, and has been very good for us.

I had cancer in 1998, and my wife has some pre-existing conditions, but Washington has a strict questionnaire-based insurance approval process that an insurance commissioner managed to get put into place over a decade ago for individual policies.

You fill out this questionnaire, and are scored, and based on the score, the insurer must cover you or may decline. There is no skeezy, &quot;well, you&#039;re taking sleeping pills&quot; nonsense. That&#039;s got a score attached. Even with our health history, we have no chronic problems and are generally well, and thus were covered.

Washington doesn&#039;t allow pre-existing conditions to be excluded except in the case of moving from a less-expensive (less-inclusive) to more-expensive (more comprehensive) health plan, and even then most exclusions end after 6 months. (You can&#039;t, in other words, get better coverage when you know you have major health issues coming up in the next few months.)

(There&#039;s also the federal laws that disallow pre-existing condition exclusions if you have continuous individual or group coverage before getting a new policy. I&#039;m not sure why your wife&#039;s policy would have been written to exclude head issues; I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s legal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bleed for you about that. In Washington State, things are a bit different, though for how long I don&#8217;t know. Perhaps our cost of medical care is lower, but we pay $1,300 per month for a family of four (my wife and I and our two sons, who are 2 and 5) with a $0 deductible, 20% co-pay to $10K out of pocket each ($30K total per year as a family), some optical ($200 every two years), chiropractic, etc. It&#8217;s an awesome plan, and has been very good for us.</p>
<p>I had cancer in 1998, and my wife has some pre-existing conditions, but Washington has a strict questionnaire-based insurance approval process that an insurance commissioner managed to get put into place over a decade ago for individual policies.</p>
<p>You fill out this questionnaire, and are scored, and based on the score, the insurer must cover you or may decline. There is no skeezy, &#8220;well, you&#8217;re taking sleeping pills&#8221; nonsense. That&#8217;s got a score attached. Even with our health history, we have no chronic problems and are generally well, and thus were covered.</p>
<p>Washington doesn&#8217;t allow pre-existing conditions to be excluded except in the case of moving from a less-expensive (less-inclusive) to more-expensive (more comprehensive) health plan, and even then most exclusions end after 6 months. (You can&#8217;t, in other words, get better coverage when you know you have major health issues coming up in the next few months.)</p>
<p>(There&#8217;s also the federal laws that disallow pre-existing condition exclusions if you have continuous individual or group coverage before getting a new policy. I&#8217;m not sure why your wife&#8217;s policy would have been written to exclude head issues; I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s legal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Reading Habits Have Changed by Stefen Niemeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=314#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefen Niemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=314#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Well, instead of reading one German regional newspaper as I did as a pupil each morning at breakfast (for free cause mum paid), or the two (one local, one national) I read as a student (shared subscription with my friend), plus some more in the library, for around 8 years I cruise through 4-15 local to international newspapers the night before breakfast, for free again.

Sometimes melancholy makes me buy a Sunday newspaper - that&#039;ll end with the iPad.

But still, each second Saturday I eagerly wait for my new c&#039;t magazin (www.heise.de/ct) from Heise. No app for that - yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, instead of reading one German regional newspaper as I did as a pupil each morning at breakfast (for free cause mum paid), or the two (one local, one national) I read as a student (shared subscription with my friend), plus some more in the library, for around 8 years I cruise through 4-15 local to international newspapers the night before breakfast, for free again.</p>
<p>Sometimes melancholy makes me buy a Sunday newspaper &#8211; that&#8217;ll end with the iPad.</p>
<p>But still, each second Saturday I eagerly wait for my new c&#8217;t magazin (www.heise.de/ct) from Heise. No app for that &#8211; yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Twitter Wire Service by Glenn Rossman</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Rossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Excellent points ... appreciate the comments. You are completely &quot;in the know&quot; about the current state of media and journalism. We need a healthy, reinvigorated Fourth Estate. It can&#039;t happen soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points &#8230; appreciate the comments. You are completely &#8220;in the know&#8221; about the current state of media and journalism. We need a healthy, reinvigorated Fourth Estate. It can&#8217;t happen soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Twitter Wire Service by Zonker</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say the *real* bad is the lack of investigative and comprehensive reporting / writing. No one is paying for detailed reporting that puts a big picture in context anymore. It&#039;s all focused on the immediate and what happened today -- whether from the source or a journalist or blogger. There&#039;s not a lot of really comprehensive and insightful coverage anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the *real* bad is the lack of investigative and comprehensive reporting / writing. No one is paying for detailed reporting that puts a big picture in context anymore. It&#8217;s all focused on the immediate and what happened today &#8212; whether from the source or a journalist or blogger. There&#8217;s not a lot of really comprehensive and insightful coverage anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Twitter Wire Service by Zonker</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=295#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say &quot;unfiltered from the source&quot; is potentially bad, but not always -- and not necessarily worse than the state of reporting today. 

Look at many of the publications out there now that basically send out information unedited directly from sources without context or checking. It&#039;s minimal filtering at best -- but with a veneer of objectivity and filtering because if readers don&#039;t know how the sausage is made, they may assume that all the normal reporting functions are going on -- despite the fact that many reporters are far too overburdened in this environment to do the same depth of reporting they did five to ten years ago. 

Also -- let&#039;s face it, some filtering is not good. Some people report with major bias that *isn&#039;t* disclosed and that doesn&#039;t serve the audience well either. At least when getting straight from the horse&#039;s mouth you can make the connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say &#8220;unfiltered from the source&#8221; is potentially bad, but not always &#8212; and not necessarily worse than the state of reporting today. </p>
<p>Look at many of the publications out there now that basically send out information unedited directly from sources without context or checking. It&#8217;s minimal filtering at best &#8212; but with a veneer of objectivity and filtering because if readers don&#8217;t know how the sausage is made, they may assume that all the normal reporting functions are going on &#8212; despite the fact that many reporters are far too overburdened in this environment to do the same depth of reporting they did five to ten years ago. </p>
<p>Also &#8212; let&#8217;s face it, some filtering is not good. Some people report with major bias that *isn&#8217;t* disclosed and that doesn&#8217;t serve the audience well either. At least when getting straight from the horse&#8217;s mouth you can make the connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Future of Computing&#8221; or &#8220;The End of the Desktop as We Know It (Amen)&#8221; by Twitted by LaureePR</title>
		<link>http://www.bakercg.com/blog/?p=302#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by LaureePR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bakercg.com/blog/?p=302#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by LaureePR [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by LaureePR [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

